SWOT and PESTEL analysis of Nestle

tog up and PESTEL analysis of NestleIntroduction This report gives a strategic analysis of Nestl. Critically analysing the home(a) whole caboodle of the starchy, this report presents a organize analysis to reveal an identification of the internal strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats seen within Nestl. Nestl is a company with a varied check portfolio consisting of a encompassing range of returns including a number of ho mappinghold chumps Nescafe, Rowntrees Fruit Pastilles and Nesquik. Earlier this year, Forbes (2014, p.1) referred to Nescafe, one of Nestls core brands as the 27th most valu fit brand in the world. Employing over 8000 employees, Nestl is present in a number of domestic and international trades. With their headquarters in Switzerland, Nestl is a starchy, which in total operates within 86 countries of which North America is their largest and most profitable market (Shotter, 2012, p.1). The firms strong internationalisation dodge reflects the fir ms commitment to re man-made lake and might maturement in the away environment. This will be explored promote by means of the use of a PESTLE analysis to determine the key external forces present within the macro environment and, how importantly Nestl respond to such forces in a strategic manner. A look back at the history of the firm reveals a strong commitment to product development. It all began back in the mid-1860s when Nestl created a bran- sassy baby formula to offer to the market. Seeing a intermission in the market underpinned by those mothers who could not breastfeed, Nestl developed a formula to be offered to the European market. This very early development within Nestl soon developed to include an expansion of products within the firm with java being added to milk products to reach a larger luff market. Since its first product offerings, Nestl has gone on to have a varied brand portfolio with annual gross sales of $100.64 billion (Nestl, 2014, p.1). Nestls mi ssion Nestls mission statement is support by the behavior good food, good life (Nestl, 2014, p. 1). Meaning more than the nutritional nurses of the food they produce, Nestl support the need to show a commitment to quality, safety and in the long run convenience for the consumer to enhance enjoyment. The notion of the creation of sh atomic number 18d value is a main reduce of the firm and is an area which is supported by the firms ability to go beyond compliance and sustainability and create new and greater value for our people, our shareholders and society as a whole (Nestl , 2014, p.1). This statement supports the structured nestle Nestl adopt through their commitment to recognising the responsibility the firm has to the wider external environment, which moves beyond a simple aspiration of profit. SWOT analysis This section presents a SWOT analysis to review the micro environment of the firm reflecting specifically upon the strengths and weaknesses of Nestl and the opportun ities and threats the firm must respond to through an alignment of firm strengths to such forces. A SWOT analysis is often used, as a strategic fauna to allow a presentation of the firms resources and capabilities, which can be further, developed to upkeep agonistical expediency. A SWOT analysis so underpins the development of future strategic options. As seen within the work of Barney (1991, p. 99) and Teece (2009, p. 12) a desirable competitive advantage is one obtained through a minimisation of threats aligned with the seizing of opportunities. Table One SWOT analysis Table one below reveals the internal kinetics of Nestl and the opportunities/threats facing the firm. Positive Factors Negative Factors Internal Factors Strengths Strong cultural values stemming from the firms integrated approach to business and commitment to their stakeholders (Schein, 2012, p.3). Current strategic position of Nestl supported by three key areas of business quality leading, client b liss and sustainability ( melody Green, 2013, p. 1). Nestl have a strong commitment to corporate tender responsibility with fictitious character being made to long term commitment never being sacrificed for short-term performance (CSR Wire, 2014, p. 1). Diversified and varied brand portfolio. Global recognition set by the number of strong brands within the firms portfolio. The reputation of Nestls brand is estimated to be valued at $7billion (Nestl, 2014b, p.1). Nestl has a bespeak in the heart of consumers due to its longstanding history. Development of trust and loyalty highlighting the capability development of the firm. Strong teamwork within the firm promoting good trains of job satisfaction and employee commitment. Weakness A number of Nestls products have faced criticism as a result of their nutritional value. Increased emphasis has been placed on healthy eating through government initiatives and Nestl would benefit from reviewing a number of their products to s upport their mission of good food and good life in a changing social environment i.e. rising levels of child obesity. The past of Nestl is tainted in parts by negative public relations as a result of what is referred to as the baby milk scandal. Noted in a recent article by Muller (2013, p.1) it was stated that the scandal had grown up but not gone away. Recognising the need for stability and consistency in the processes found within the companys global sum chain. supranational standards demand a need for standardisation yet this has to be balanced with the firms strategic need for adaptation to different cultural environments. remote Factors Opportunities Ability to reach new consumer markets and in particular new international markets i.e. Nestls work in emerging economies. Further internationalisations with a particular focus on the BRICS economies (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) these economies are noted as being current yield spots (Wilson and Purush othaman, 2003, p. 1). Development of intangible capabilities to aid competitive advantage. Barney (1991, p.100) argues that competitive advantage is achieved through inimitability and this should be a focus of the firm. Backwards integration to gain more control over the put out chain of the firm (Martin and Eisenhardt, 2010, p.1105 ). sophisticated development of distribution channels. Threats Higher levels of buyer power within the assiduity fuelled by greater choice and lower loyalty (Porter, 2008, p.12 2011, p.5). Variability in unsanded material prices influencing the firms ability to sustain prices in light of a commitment to wider responsibilities aside from profit i.e. CSR initiatives (Servaes and Tamayo, 2013, p.1047). Increased dynamism in the external macro environment fuelling short-term decision making and heightened competition (Teece, 2009, p.15). Technological change driving both innovation and associated challenges. Ageing population shifting the demogra phics of the workforce (Kooij et al, 2014, p. 2192). The SWOT analysis above reveals that Nestl have a number of strengths, which translate into the development of core resources and capabilities, which aids their competitive position. Notably, one of the core strengths of Nestl is the strong brand image they have which inspires trust in consumers. Nestl are able to build on this reputation to extend their brand categories. Further, recent efforts to follow corporate social responsibility strategies have heightened the firms approach to sustainability, which is aligned to current expectations from the consumer market for firms to take a greater responsibility towards the wider macro environment. Moving on to a censorious analysis of the weaknesses of the company, one of the core weaknesses of Nestl is the content of some of their products, which marks a move away from healthy eating initiatives. For example, Nestl produce a number of confectionary goods including sweets and choco late bars. Nestl will in the future have to work with the UK government to ensure that a clear market message is put across for such treats to notwithstanding be enjoyed alongside a balanced diet. Overall, however, Nestls strengths overshadow their weaknesses and many of the weaknesses are being tackled by strategic actions. Recognition of the firms opportunities and threats leads to a discussion of the value of internationalisation and in particular the opportunities present within emerging economies. Further, the development of capabilities and thus the translation of strengths into intangible and inimitable capabilities is an area, which could see the firm, further develop their sustainable competitive advantage. Developing from the opportunities of the firm, it is also necessary to consider the threats, which face Nestl. The SWOT analysis revealed one of the core threats is the increasingly competitive character of the industry and the challenges, which arise from this level o f competition. As a result, a great threat facing the firm is the level of dynamism and turbulence to contend with which influences the personality and direction of strategic choices. PESTLE analysis A PESTLE analysis is used as a strategic tool to measure industry dynamics through recognition of the core political, economical, social, technological, legal and environmental forces/changes having influence on the industry (Henry, 2007, p.23). Table two below presents a PESTLE analysis for the industry Nestl are present within and this information is then used to form a critical discussion for the future strategic options available to the firm. Table twain PESTLE analysis The PESTLE analysis below identifies a number of forces, which have an influence on industry dynamics. Of these forces, perhaps the most prominent are social forces, which relate to differences in consumer behaviour. As an international firm, Nestl have to be able to ensure a level of adaptation, which is approp riate to different markets driven by different cultures and consumer preferences. Political Changing regulation surrounding food standards and marketing actions. Government stability in new emerging economies question of risk as part of the internationalisation process (Kumar et al, 2013, p.205). Changing global regulations standardised practice yet adaptation to different political forces (De Mooij, 2013, p.61). Economic Awareness and knowledge of changing inflation, economic growth rates and income levels. Changing consumer budgets, rise of the cost conscious consumer. Rising price of raw material goods in relation to the need to source from sustainable suppliers (Kumar et al, 2013, p.205). Social Changing consumer attitudes move towards healthier products in line with government initiatives (Newman et al, 2014, p.15) supporting balanced diets and the dangers of sugar. Changing lifestyle return back to home base cooking and the promotion of family time in a world o f convenience. The need to adapt to different cultural settings i.e. language, religious beliefs and family settings. Understanding of consumer behaviour is crucial to ensuring a personal approach to marketing. Consumers viewing the firm as an agency for power in the wider external environment (Eisenhardt et al, 2010 1263). Technological Rise of social media, consumers interacting with firms and being able to do so across a range of platforms. Innovation fuelled by technological developments. E-commerce as a platform for development (Lin et al, 2014, p.3). Legal 1.Changing nature of regulation. 2. film to adhere to global regulations and changes across different international markets (Schaffer et al, 2014, p. 12). Environmental Increased attention directed towards corporate social responsibility (Servaes and Tamayo, 2013, p. 1045). Environmental concerns from consumers including concerns over promotional material/recycling (Dubois, 2012, p. 36). Corporate Objectives It is important that an alignment exists between corporate objectives, brand image and firm activities (Cornelissen, 2014, p.55). Commonly used as a strategic tool to support this analysis, Ansoffs ground substance can be applied to Nestl to review the different strategic options available to the firm (Ansoff, 1980, p. 133). The overall corporate objective of Nestl is to be one of the worlds best and largest brands in the food industry. To break this down further, there is a need to apply individual firm level marketing objectives to a specific brand within their portfolio. This section focuses upon the presentation of marketing objectives and strategies for Nestls baby milk products. marketing Objectives Marketing objectives identify a target market and market need and apply this to the brands they are offering. With regards to the baby milk products Nestl offers, one of their core marketing objectives should relate to improving sales through the use of social media outlets. Ali gned to the rise of relationship marketing and the need to develop a deeper, emotional connection with consumers it is argued that one of the marketing objectives for increasing sales of this product needs to be related to understanding the consumer base. The following marketing objectives are proposed in relation to the firms baby milk products To add interaction with consumers using social media as a platform. To increase sales by 10% through a promotional campaign across an integrated set of marketing platforms. To follow a relationship marketing campaign to increase interactions with consumers to enhance understanding of the consumer base. Ansoffs matrix Ansoffs growth matrix is a marketing tool often used to understand the different strategic options available to a firm (Ansoff, 1980, p. 131). Looking at the opportunities available in both new and subsisting markets, emphasis within the matrix is placed on the benefits and challenges of each strategic option and the ex tent to which the options are aligned to the internal resources and capabilities of the firm. Market Penetration Market penetration is a dodging, which sees growth underpinned by pushing existing products to existing markets. Through a focus on market penetration the firm would be able to maintain current product lines and focus upon increasing sales in this area through promotional activities and advertising. Market penetration is a outline, which would secure growth in the market and would allow the firm to draw on their knowledge of the market to expand sales in this area. Market Development The second strategic option refers to the use of selling existing products to new markets. A new market in this case could be a new consumer base or a new geographical base. Reflecting upon the nature of the product, it is unlikely Nestl would be able to target a new customer base and thus it is advised that if this strategic option were to be followed emphasis would be placed on opening up to new emerging markets with existing products. Product Development Moving away from a focus on the market, the third strategic option offered by Ansoff places emphasis on the importance of product development. This strategic option would require the firm to develop new competencies, which would appeal to existing markets. Under this strategic option, Nestl could focus on the development of a new extension of products in the baby market to offer to the consumer base. Diversification The final option outlined is that of diversification. Diversification is a strategy, which refers to growth achieved by offering new products to new markets. This type of strategy would require a need for the firm to draw on their inherent strengths and capabilities to offer something new to the market. Underpinned by high levels of innovation, this strategy would require both investment and an appreciation of risk. As such, before the adoption of this strategy it would be necessary for the firm to have a clear mass of outcome. Which growth strategy to follow? Based on a discussion of the various growth options above, this report argues that Nestl should focus upon market penetration through the use of promotional activities and relationship marketing activities. This strategy would see Nestl focus upon an existing product and market yet achieve growth through marketing campaigns and a greater utilisation of social media. Through the use of social media and relationship marketing it would be hoped that Nestl would be able to develop a stronger connection with their consumers, which is unsounded when needing to gain the trust of new mothers (Iglesias et al, 2011, p. 632). Strength in the baby market is underpinned by the potential for growth due to this being a growing market. combative Strategies In support of an identification of growth strategies, there is a need to recognise the importance of competitive strategies. Three core competitive strategies are set within the lit Cost leadership, differentiation and focus (Ortega, 2010, p. 1275). Despite a traditional view that different competitive strategies couldnt be mixed, recent literature has supported the use of a hybrid competitive strategy, which combines cost leadership and differentiation to support a competitive strategy, which balances the actions of each strategy (Baroto et al, 2012, p. 120). Cost leadership is a strategy, which places emphasis on lowest cost and thus sees the firm seeking to compete with their competition on the basis of price. Cost leadership strategies wherefore require an efficient approach to the supply chain to ensure that raw material costs are kept to a minimum. Emphasis within this strategy is placed on the need to focus upon gaining economies of scale and thus low costs. Differentiation involves firms seeking to distinguish themselves from their competitors (Armstrong and Cunningham, 2012, p. 71). For this to be the case, emphasis is placed on the development of a competitive advantage through something others cannot imitate. The final competitive strategy is a focus strategy where a segmentation approach is followed (Weinstein, 2013, p. 51). A firm following a focus strategy would firm to choose a niche market and therefore have specific offerings to a specific target market. In light of the identification of the competitive strategies and the discussion above, it is advised that the firm should follow a hybrid strategy reflecting on both cost leadership and differentiation to ensure growth. A hybrid strategy would require Nestl to seek lowest cost where possible through economies of scale and efficiency in their supply chain whilst also seeing the firm differentiating through the culture of the firm and the relationships developed with consumers. 7ps of marketing A final consideration for Nestl is an identification of the 7ps of marketing and in particular an understanding of what their product offers to the market (Armstrong and Cu nningham, 2012, p. 34). The 7ps of marketing is an important marketing tool outlining a focus on a clear understanding of each factor Product Baby formula, nutrients to enable a progression from breast milk to formula or formula for those mothers choosing not to breastfeed. Price Price relatively low to competitors. It is important to balance the need here between low cost and the influence this has on trust. Place Supermarkets, place of convincing. Promotion Relationship marketing principles used to engage the consumer. Nestl will interact with consumers during a shopping mall road show to showcase their product offerings and the value of their products. People Employees within the firm used to support the growth strategy of particular products. Company objectives and marketing objective translates into performance goals for teams within the firm. Process guest service is important and a key determinant of trust. As a result of this, emphasis should be placed on the role of employees in educating the consumer and therefore translating the core elements of the brand. Physical evidence Physical evidence in the form of packaging and promotional tools will be used to support the development of the growth strategy employed. Monitoring and controlling As a closing point, there is a need to consider the importance of the ongoing superviseing of any marketing plan. Long after the implementation, emphasis should still be placed on monitoring to ensure that controls are put in place to review the success of a given marketing campaign (Simons, 2013, p. 14). For example, in relation to the use of social media, particular controls can be put in place to monitor the success and thus levels of integration taking place. References Ansoff, H. I. (1980). Strategic issue management. Strategic Management Journal, 1(2), 131-148. Armstrong, G., Cunningham, M. H. (2012). Principles of marketing. Pearson Australia. Barney, J.B (1991) Firm resources and sustained comp etitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17 (1) 99-120. Baroto, M. B., Abdullah, M. M. B., Wan, H. L. (2012). Hybrid strategy a new strategy for competitive advantage. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(20), p120. Business Green (2013) Nestl brews up stronger environmental commitments online. purchasable from http//www.businessgreen.com/bg/news/2254765/Nestl-brews-up-stronger-environmental-commitments Accessed 06.10.14-. Burke, R. J., Cooper, C. L., Field, J. (2013). The Aging manpower Individual, Organizational and Societal Opportunities and Challenges. The SAGE Handbook of Aging, Work and Society, 1. Cornelissen, J (2014) Corporate communication a guide to theory and practice. London SAGE publications. CSR Wire (2014) CSR profile of Nestl online. Available from http//www.csrwire.com/members/10393-Nestl Accessed 05.10.14. De Mooij (2013) Global marketing and advertising understanding cultural paradoxes. London SAGE publications. Dubois, M. (2012). E xtended producer responsibility for consumer waste the gap between economic theory and implementation. Waste Management Research, 30(9 suppl), 36-42. Eisenhardt, K. M., Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities what are they?. Strategic management journal, 21(10-11), 1105-1121. Eisenhardt, K. M., Furr, N. R., Bingham, C. B. (2010). CROSSROADS-Microfoundations of Performance Balancing Efficiency and Flexibility in Dynamic Environments. Organization Science, 21(6), 1263-1273. Forbes (2014) Nestl online. Available from http//www.forbes.com/companies/nescafe/ Accessed 06.10.14. Henry, A.E (2007) Understanding strategic management. Oxford Oxford University Press. Iglesias, O., Sauquet, A., Montaa, J. (2011). The role of corporate culture in relationship marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 45(4), 631-650. Kooij, D. T., Jansen, P. G., Dikkers, J. S., de Lange, A. H. (2014). Managing aging workers a mixed methods study on bundles of HR practices for aging workers. The Int ernational Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(15), 2192-2212. Kumar, V., Mudambi, R., Gray, S. (2013). Internationalization, Innovation and Institutions The 3 Is underpinning the competitiveness of emerging market firms. Journal of International Management, 19(3), 203-206. Kumar, M., Srai, J., Pattinson, L., Gregory, M. (2013). Mapping of the UK food supply chains capturing trends and structural changes. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 10(2), 299-326. Lin, Y., Luo, J., Zhou, L., Ieromonachou, P., Huang, L., Cai, S., Ma, S. (2014, June). The impacts of service quality and customer satisfaction in the e-commerce context. In Service Systems and Service Management (ICSSSM), 2014 eleventh International Conference on (pp. 1-6) Muller, M (2013) Nestl baby milk scandal has grown up but not gone away online. Available from http//www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/Nestl-baby-milk-scandal-food-industry-standards Accessed 06.10.14. Nestl (2014) almost us onli ne. Available from http//www.Nestl.com/aboutus Accessed 05.10.14. Newman, C. L., Howlett, E., Burton, S. (2014). Shopper Response to Front-of-Package Nutrition Labeling Programs Potential Consumer and Retail Store Benefits. Journal of Retailing, 90(1), 13-26. Ortega, M. J. R. (2010). Competitive strategies and firm performance Technological capabilities moderating roles. Journal of Business Research, 63(12), 1273-1281. Porter, M.E (2008) On competition. Boston Harvard University Press. Porter, M. E. (2011). Competitive advantage of nations creating and sustaining superior performance. New York Simon and Schuster. Servaes, H., Tamayo, A. (2013). The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm value The role of customer awareness. Management Science, 59(5), 1045-1061. Schaffer, R., Agusti, F., Dhooge, L. (2014). International business law and its environment. London Cengage Learning.