No Child Left Behind Creates More Problems for Students than it does So

The No fry go forth Behind Act was knowing by President George W. Bush in 2001. Although this act seems to be sore edge and has generated enormous amounts of both controversy and support, this is not the first metre American instruction has seen such an attempt to improve education. According to the U.S. subdivision of Education, the purpose of No electric shaver Left Behind is to improve educatee achievement and change the culture of Americas schools. ?The NCLB Act of 2001, the revised Elementary and secondary coil Education Act, is a potent blend of new requirements, incentives and resources and it poses significant challenges for states? (?Education Commission of the States,? 2003). No Child Left Behind laws require that each state must develop and implement an accountability system ? keeping schools accountable for the performance of all bookmans is the cornerstone of the NCLB Act? (2003). There ar four main principles to the new plan Greater accountability for student achievement, greater flexibility for states, districts and schools in the use of federal funds (more specifically Title I funds) and more choices for parents of children from disadvantaged backgrounds and an emphasis on teaching methods that have been demonstrated and proven to work. However and even still, No Child Left Behind creates more problems for students than it does solutions because of accountability laws. More specifically, students in special(prenominal) education are held to the same standards that students in regular education are held to.Under the requirements for No Child Left Behind Act every(prenominal) school must have highly qualified teachers and must execute adequate yearly progress. Additionally, each school must report attendance, examine scores and other statistics p... ... www.NoChildLeftBehind.comPascopella, A. (2005) Technology cuts run deep. Retrieved 2005, March 11 privileged the Law.com Analyzing, Explaining and Debating NCLB.Willia ms, Patrick (2004, 12 January). No Child Left Behind Legislation is a Bad Law. Independent Record. Retrieved February 28, 2005, from http//www.helenair. com/articles/2004/01/21/opinions/a04012104_03.txtWright, Pamela, Wright Peter (2003). No Child Left Behind. Harbor House Law Press. Retrieved February 26, 2005, from http//www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1892320126/qid=1109887307/sr=8-2/ref=pd_ka_1/102-1349734-1050505v=glance&s=books&n=507846Wycliff, Donald (2003, 2 October) Skirting the No Child Left Behind. The Chicago Tribune. Retrieved February 28, 2005 from http//www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/chi-0310020171oct02,0,6652365.column