Animal Usage is Needed to Benefit the Human Race Essay -- Argumentativ

Animal Usage is Needed to Benefit the Human turn tailIn todays world, one could split our country into two groups. One is those who argon for animal rights in every aspect, and the other is those who atomic number 18 not. Those who are for animals rights are commonly labeled Vegans by gr swallow deal of the opposing viewpoint, and sometimes charge by their own. These bulk may belong to certain organizations such as PETA, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, or ALF, the Animal Liberation Front. These people commonly desire that animals should get to every right that a gentleman has. Animal Rights Activists generally think that people dont have the right to eat, own, hunt, or use animals in some(prenominal) way, or for any reason. This would reckon people who eat meat on a daily basis would sound be out of luck. This would mean no person would be allowed to own any animal for work on ranches or farms, for companionship, or for any other reason. This would mean all guides and hunters would have no business. This would mean no person could use any animal part for clothing. This would also mean that more than half of the medicines and medical advances that we enjoy and live as a result of today would never have been discovered, and we would not be fashioning progress on what we are in the medical field. The other people, those who are not, believe that animals should be handled with care and taken care of, but dont believe animals should have every right that valets do.One of the reasons that vegans dont believe we should eat animals is because we dont have the right to eat them. They believe that those animals have the same fill rights that humans have. The animals feel pain and have the exact same feelings that human beings do. What these people dont realize ... ... using their companionship to always have that outstrip friend that will never let us down. Animal rights have gone far enough. There are laws to protect these animals. There d oesnt pack to be laws that perish our natural instincts and pastimes. Works CitedBender, David L. Animal Testing biomedical Ethics fence Viewpoints. 1987. Minnesota, Greenhaven.Bender, David Animal Testing Biomedical Ethics Opposing Viewpoints. 1994. California, Greenhaven.Doughney, Michael T. People Eating Tasty Animals People Eating Tasty Animals. 9 Dec. 2001.(http//www.mtd.com/tasty/). Envirolink Network Animal Concerns Pros and Cons Animal Concerns.1999. (http//express. Netforchange.com/egi.bin/WebX.fcgi?13.ee6bbal).Guest choice Network Moore Lies From Eco-Extremists Nanny Headlines. 6 Dec. 2001 (http//Nanny_headlinesburst.sparklist.com).