Ethical Dilemmas Essay

There be three situations presented in the simulation which poses different estimable dilemmas on the commence of the finale-maker. The symptoms of the respective dilemmas and their root causes sh all(prenominal) be discussed individually because analysis would be square-toed if they are able to locate the root cause of the conflict (Lee). The talkative Relationship The first situation presented was an indiscreet relationship between a boss and his secretary. The boss took the secretary along with him during business trips at the expenditure of the company.He even promoted the secretary to junior account executive. This problem created a stir within the company and corridor talks went around saying that the office to make it finished the ladder of success in the company was through less than ethical means. This has caused an unrest among the employees of the organization that an ethical stand should be taken. However, the decision-maker had an ethical dilemma in making his decision. The boss, Patrick, is his originator friend and accomplice who was the one instrumental in landing him his job.Patrick also helped him during his early years with the company in getting hold of the ropes of the business of the company. On the early(a) hand, company morale is going down because the employees think he is an wrong leader for allowing Patrick have his way in maintaining an indiscreet relations with his auxiliary and in spending company resources in the process. This is what defines the ethical dilemma here. Sniffdog The instant situation presented by the simulation which involved an ethical dilemma is the decision to represent SilverPill and their Sniffdog account.Sniffdog is a computer schedule which could sneak into the users hardware and retrieve many cloak-and-dagger data without the users k forthwithledge. The ethical dilemma comes in when taking the account means wages of the attack of privacy while non taking the account ordain make the com pany lose a lot of money by losing the account. The fact that compounds these all is that SilverPill informed the company that they go away give all their accounts to McKinley should they choose to endorse Sniffdog.The ethics masterbook of McKinley states that the employees will maintain impeachable integrity in all its business dealings. Allowing Sniffdog to push through will not forge well of this ethical district. On its face, the business being dealt with here is evidently business and nothing will be objectionable about it. McKinley will just seek to endorse the Sniffdog program. However, when the program has capabilities of sneaking into private information, an ethical issue arises for McKinley will be signing itself to be part of such intrusion.Although SilverPill promised not to use any information that may be garner for any illegal or extralegal use nor to sell it to a triplet party, the fact alone that there will be intrusion into the private lives of the users of the program will already present a cogent ethical issue. Thus, the root cause of the problem here is whether or not to be a part of a project which can move into into the private lives of clients by collecting confidential information from them without their knowledge. think of EddieAnd the third situation with an ethical dilemma presented by the simulation is whether or not to ruin certain information about the program Sniffdog to Think Eddie which is a competitor of SilverPill. At this point, SilverPill is no longer associated with McKinley and has moved on to some other PR company. Think Eddie has entered the picture and wants McKinley to represent them for a computer program which has the same features as that of SilverPills Sniffdog. Think Eddie is a big client.And now it wants information about the Sniffdog program without, however, threats of any sanctions given to McKinley in oddball of non-compliance. The ethical dilemma here is whether to reveal the requested informat ion to Think Eddie or not. Though Think Eddie did not give any threats for non-disclosure, sure there was an unwritten statement accompanying the request that non-disclosure might nervous strain the relationship between the two companies. On the other hand, the ethics rule book of McKinley prescribes them not to hold conflicting interests.SilverPill, though a former client, still has the reform that every information given by it to McKinley be kept confidential by the latter. Because of the mentioned rule, McKinley is duty-bound not to divulge confidential client information, especially in this case where the revelation will be made to a competitor. The root cause of the problem, therefore, is whether or not to reveal information obtained from a former reservation in order to cave in a better business relationship with a new exponentiation even though the two have conflicting interests and the former engagement has already been severed.In all, the ethical dilemmas arise not be cause of the ethics rule books established by company but mostly because of moral grounds. If doing what is right produces something bad, or if doing what is wrong produces something good, the force of moral obligation may depend balanced by the reality of the good end. We can have the triumph of being right, regardless of the damage done or we can mark for what seems to be the best outcome, regardless of what wrongs must be committed (Ross, 2007). Thus, the root of these dilemmas is simply because there are moral standards to which, companies as well as persons, must adhere.